Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Joseph Gilberti, Jr. v. The Pentagon
as 22-1854
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSEPH D. GILBERTI, JR., P.E. an Individual and Licensed Professional Engineer
Defendant / Appellee:
THE PENTAGON, FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF ATLANTA, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, (FBI) and others
Adesijuola Ogunjobi v. United Nations
as 21-1694
Defendant / Appellee:
CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION, UNITED NATIONS and WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION
Plaintiff:
DALLAS COWBOYS, NATIONAL BASKETBALL ASSOCIATION, 5 WORLD MARKETS CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ADESIJUOLA OGUNJOBI
Gilberti v. The Pentagon et al
as 1:2021cv00680
Defendant:
World Health Organization-Pan American Health Organization, Kay Ivey, Central Intelligence Agency and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph D. Gilberti, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kinfe-Michael Negash v. Kingstowne Residential Owners
as 20-1884
Defendant / Appellee:
WALMART HEADQUARTERS, AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, FBI HEADQUARTERS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KINFE-MICHAEL NEGASH
Negash v. Kingstowne Residential Owners Corporation and Involved Persons and Associates et al
as 1:2020cv00854
Defendant:
Bangladesh, BJ's, U.S. House of Representatives and others
Plaintiff:
Kinfe-Michael Negash
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Adesijuola Ogunjobi v. United Nations
as 20-1688
Defendant / Appellee:
CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION, UNITED NATIONS and WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION
Plaintiff:
DALLAS COWBOYS, NATIONAL BASKETBALL ASSOCIATION, 5 WORLD MARKETS CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ADESIJUOL OGUNJOBI and ADESIJUOLA OGUNJOBI
Toks Banc Corp et al v. United Nations et al
as 3:2020cv00393
Plaintiff:
Dallas Cowboys, National Basketball Association, 5 World Markets Corporation and others
Defendant:
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, United Nations and World Health Organization
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
