Cases 1 - 10 of 1,247
v. City of Raleigh
as 5:2024cv00541
Defendant:
City of Raleigh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Hernandez v. City of Raleigh et al
as 5:2024cv00542
Defendant:
Thomas Webb, City of Raleigh, Lloyd's, London and others
Plaintiff:
Abdul Kareem Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Deal v. City of Monroe
as 3:2024cv00845
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Deal
Defendant:
City of Monroe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
CIG 694, LLC v. City of Jacksonville, North Carolina
as 7:2024cv00848
Defendant:
City of Jacksonville, North Carolina
Plaintiff:
CIG 694, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
City of Dunn v. AGC Chemicals Americas Inc. et al
as 5:2024cv00497
Defendant:
Dynax Corporation, Carrier Global Corporation, Chemdesign Products, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
City of Dunn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Product Liability
VANKEUREN v. CITY OF CONCORD et al
as 1:2024cv00730
Defendant:
CITY OF CONCORD and KEVIN BERG
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL VANKEUREN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Carpenter v. City of Newton et al
as 5:2024cv00192
Plaintiff:
Walter Kevin Carpenter
Defendant:
The City of Newton, Kevin Yoder and Brian Keith Whitener
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 cv Notice of Removal - Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00782
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Williams v. Ratchford et al
as 3:2024cv00771
Defendant:
City of Charlotte, Jose Torres, Tawan Skeen and others
Plaintiff:
Khairi Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00478
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
