Cases 11 - 20 of 46
Lawanda Jones v. Education Affiliates, Inc.
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 18-20051
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LAWANDA BEASLEY JONES
Defendant - Appellee:
EDUCATION AFFILIATES, INCORPORATED
Lawanda Jones v. Education Affiliates, Inc.
as 18-20051
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LAWANDA BEASLEY JONES
Defendant / Appellee:
EDUCATION AFFILIATES, INCORPORATED
Tommy White v. Jacqueline Banks, et al
as 17-60645
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TOMMY DEMINTO WHITE
Defendant - Appellee:
JACQUELINE BANKS, MARSHALL TURNER, HUBERT DAVIS and others
USA v. Aaron Beasley
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 17-10945
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
AARON BEASLEY
USA v. Al Beasley
as 17-10556
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
AL TORRELL BEASLEY, also known as Rody
USA v. Damonica Beasley
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 17-10465
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
DAMONICA BEASLEY
Eddie Brown v. Marshall Fisher, et al
as 16-60809
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDDIE JOSEPH BROWN
Defendant - Appellee:
MARSHALL FISHER, JERRY WILLIAMS, MAUD IRBY and others
Albert Beasley v. William Stephens, Director
as 16-40466
Petitioner - Appellant:
ALBERT DUWAYNE BEASLEY
Respondent - Appellee:
WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Vincent Beasley v. William Stephens, Director
as 16-20039
Petitioner - Appellant:
VINCENT E. BEASLEY
Respondent - Appellee:
WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.