Cases 11 - 18 of 18
Ronald Emrit v. Davis & Crump, P.C., et al
as 15-60854
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD SATISH EMRIT
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVIS & CRUMP, P.C., BEASLEY ALLEN, P.C. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INCORPORATED
L-Con, Inc. v. CRC Ins Svc, Inc., et al
as 15-20655
Plaintiff - Appellee:
L-CON, INCORPORATED
Defendant - Appellee:
CRC INSURANCE SERVICES, INCORPORATED, formerly known as Crump Insurance Services, Inc., REGIONS INSURANCE, INCORPORATED and INTERESTED LONDON INSURERS, severally subscribing to policy numbers B0753PE1206378000 and B0753PE1206379000
Defendant-Third Party Defendant - Appellee:
CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYD'S OF LONDON, LLOYD & PARTNERS LIMITED, OILTANKING HOLDINGS AMERICAS INCORPORATED and others
Defendant-Third Party Plaintiff - Appellant:
INTERSTATE FIRE & CASUALTY COMPANY
USA v. Roberta Crump
as 15-50750
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ROBERTA CRUMP, also known as Roberta Ann Crump
First Trinity Capital Corp. v. Catlin Specialty Insurance
as 14-60021
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FIRST TRINITY CAPITAL CORPORATION
Defendant - Appellee:
CRUMP INSURANCE SERVICES, INCORPORATED
Carol Paselk v. State of Texas, et al
as 13-41049
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CAROL PASELK
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF TEXAS, HOPKINS COUNTY TEXAS, HOPKINS COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, and also all unidentified associates, directors, staff, empoloyees, officers, and volunteers in their official and individual capacities and others
Damon Patterson v. Michael Daniels, et al
as 13-30613
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAMON PATTERSON
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL DANIELS, Assistant District Attorney, ALEX CALENDA, LEON CANNIZARRO, District Attorney and others
Jamaal Crump v. J. Young
as 13-30133
Petitioner - Appellant:
JAMAAL E. CRUMP
Respondent - Appellee:
J. P. YOUNG
USA v. Robert Crump
as 12-50333
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ROBERT NELSON CRUMPS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
