Cases 21 - 28 of 28
Tommy Hamilton v. Service King Auto Repairs, et al
as 10-10879
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TOMMY J HAMILTON
Defendant - Appellee:
SERVICE KING AUTO REPAIR, ENTERPRISE RENTAL CARS and JOHN DOES, Other 1, 2, 3, 4
David Johnson v. Christopher Epps, et al
as 10-60553
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID C. JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
CHRISTOPHER B EPPS, COMMISSIONER, MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, BARBERS EXAMINATION BOARD AS JOHN DOE NUMBER 2, STATE HEALTH DEPARTMENT AS JOHN DOE NUMBER 3 and others
David Thomas, Jr. v. C. Zakhoria, et al
as 10-20090
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID THOMAS, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
C. ZAKHORIA, Houston Police Officer, C. ROZEK, Houston Police Officers, J. CHASE, Houston Police Officer and others
Jerome Lee v. Dan Smith, et al
as 10-50057
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEROME H. LEE
Defendant - Appellee:
DAN SMITH, Sheriff, BELTON POLICE DEPARTMENT, PATTERSON, Major, Commander of the Bell County Jail and others
Tina Randolph v. Dimension Films, et al
as 09-20495
Plaintiff - Appellant Cross-Appellee:
TINA M. RANDOLPH
Defendant - Appellee Cross-Appellant:
DIMENSION FILMS, MIRAMAX FILM CORP., SONY PICTURES ENTERTAINMENT, INC. and others
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN DOE(S) 1-999
Canzoneri v. Bush, et al
as 08-30762
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOANNA CANZONERI
Defendant - Appellee:
GEORGE W BUSH, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, TALL TIMBER APARTMENTS and others
Shaw v. TDCJ Inst Division, et al
as 08-20185
Plaintiff - Appellant:
OSCAR L SHAW
Defendant - Appellee:
TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION, NATHANIEL QUARTERMAN, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION, TIM MORGAN and others
Amir-Sharif v. Dallas Cty Jail SRT, et al
as 07-10914
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LAKEITH AMIR-SHARIF
Defendant - Appellee:
DALLAS COUNTY JAIL SRT UNIT, DALLAS COUNTY SHERIFF, TEXAS DALLAS COUNTY and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
