Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Cases 1 - 10 of 295
OneMain Financial Svc v. Boyer
as 24-10456
Plaintiff: OneMain Financial Services, Incorporated and OneMain Financial Group, L.L.C.
Defendant: Harold Boyer and Susan Boyer
Miller v. Chevron USA
as 24-30204
Plaintiff: Sandra Miller, on behalf of Harold Miller
Defendant: Chevron USA, Incorporated, Marathon Oil Company and Devon Energy Production Company, L.P.
Tankersley v. Smith
as 23-60622
Plaintiff / Appellant: Clarence Tankersley, also known as Clarence Douglas Tankersley, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee: Brandon Smith, Warden C.M.R.C.F., Penny Hamer, Captain C.M.R.C.F., A. Kitchens, Case Manager C.M.R.C.F. and others
USA v. Godbolt
as 23-11073
Plaintiff / Appellee: United States of America
Defendant / Appellant: Harold Godbolt
Shelby v. Lumpkin
as 23-50526
Petitioner / Appellant: Harold Allen Shelby
Respondent / Appellee: Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Heyman GuilloryIn re: Heyman Guillory
as 23-40386
Petitioner: In re: Heyman Harold Guillory
Harold HamIn re: Harold Ham
as 23-10500
Petitioner: In re: Harold Eric Ham
USA v. Foster
as 23-30288
Plaintiff / Appellee: United States of America
Defendant / Appellant: Harold Foster and Marc Dalton
Wilson v. Dabadie
as 23-30224
Plaintiff / Appellant: Cornelius Lorenzo Wilson
Defendant / Appellee: Carl Dabadie, Jr., Baton Rouge Police Chief, Harold Williams, Officer, Jeffrey Pittman, Officer and others
Locke v. Rivera
as 23-40208
Plaintiff / Appellant: Nelson A. Locke
Defendant / Appellee: Augustin Rivera, Jr., in his official capacity as Chairman of the Texas Board of Law Examiners, Teresa Ereon Giltner, in her official capacity as Vice Chairman of the Texas Board of Law Examiners, Harold Odom, in his official capacity as Member of the Texas Board of Law Examiners and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?