Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Road Sprinkler Fitters Local v. CCR Fire Protection, L.L.C.
as 19-30886
Plaintiff / Appellant: ROAD SPRINKLERS FITTERS LOCAL UNION NO. 669, U.A. AFL-CIO and ROAD SPRINKLER FITTERS LOCAL UNION NO. 669, U.A. AFL-CIO
Defendant / Appellee: QUICK RESPONSE FIRE PROTECTION
Pamela Quick v. Wal-Mart Stores, Incorporated We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-40911
Plaintiff - Appellant: PAMELA S. QUICK
Defendant - Appellee: WAL-MART STORES, INCORPORATED, doing business as WalMart
Louis Hamilton, II v. USA, et al
as 17-20313
Plaintiff - Appellant: LOUIS CHARLES HAMILTON, II
Defendant - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, STATE OF TEXAS, HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS and others
In re: Steven Quick
as 16-10398
Movant: In re: STEVEN WAYNE QUICK
Steven Quick v. Office of the Exec Director, et al
as 15-41329
Plaintiff - Appellant: STEVEN WAYNE QUICK
Defendant - Appellee: OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR and TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE - CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION DIVISION
In re: Steven Quick
as 15-10824
Movant: In re: STEVEN WAYNE QUICK
In re: Steven Quick
as 15-10022
Movant: In re: STEVEN WAYNE QUICK
James Quick v. William Stephens, Director
as 14-20656
Petitioner - Appellant: JAMES IRVIN QUICK
Respondent - Appellee: WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Courtland Tatum v. Sheriffs Dept Natchitoches, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 14-31080
Plaintiff - Appellant: COURTLAND TATUM
Defendant - Appellee: CITY OF NATCHITOCHES, CAREY ETHEREDGE, RONNIE QUICK and others
Louis Hamilton, II v. Harry Arthur, et al
as 11-20216
Plaintiff - Appellant: LOUIS CHARLES HAMILTON, II
Defendant - Appellee: HARRY C ARTHUR, LAW OFFICE OF HARRY C. ARTHUR, MARINE BUILDING, L.L.C. and others
Type: Other Statutes RICO

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?