Cases 1 - 10 of 46
Rivens-Baker v. Lambert
as 24-20141
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Rivens-Baker, Jr.
Defendant:
James Lambert, Jr., Fomijang Claude, Mathew McNeil and others
Pertee v. Risher
as 24-10027
Plaintiff:
Bernard Bruce Pertee
Defendant:
David Risher, CEO Lyft, Incorporated, Logan Green, CEO Lyft President, Chris Lambert, CEO Lyft and others
Lee v. D.R. Horton
as 23-30416
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Lindsey Lee, Wayne Ballard, Jr., Jennifer Ballard and others
Defendant / Appellee:
D.R. Horton, Incorporated, D.R. Horton, Incorporated - Gulf Coast, Acadian Trace HOA, Incorporated and others
Lambert v. MS Dept of Corr
as 23-60136
Plaintiff / Appellant:
James A. Lambert
Defendant / Appellee:
Mississippi Department of Correction, Records Department, Burl Cain, Commissioner, Mississippi Department of Corrections, Parole Board and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-30235
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Holmes v. Reddoch
as 21-30164
Defendant / Appellee:
Corbett Reddoch, H. Hardin, also known as Holly Hardin, Paul Durnin and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Michael R. Holmes
USA v. Shawn Lambert-Duck
as 20-10404
Defendant / Appellant:
SHAWN ANTON LAMBERT-DUCK
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Michael Wigginton, Jr. v. University of Mississippi, et al
as 19-60268
Defendant / Appellant:
PROVOST MORRIS H. STOCKS, Individually and in his official capacity as Provost, CHANCELLOR DANIEL W. JONES, Individually and in his official capacity as Chancellor, CHAIR ERIC LAMBERT, Individually and in his official capacity as Department Chair and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
MICHAEL WIGGINTON, JR.
Timothy Lambert v. Marquette Trans Company
as 18-40661
Plaintiff - Appellee:
TIMOTHY LAMBERT
Defendant - Appellant:
MARQUETTE TRANSPORTATION COMPANY OFFSHORE, L.L.C.
Carla Blake v. Don Lambert
as 18-60176
Plaintiff - Appellee:
CARLA BLAKE
Defendant - Appellant:
DON LAMBERT, in his individual capacity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
