Cases 1 - 10 of 17
USA v. Capps
as 23-10446
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Robert Burney Capps
Carlos Almeda v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, et al
as 19-11326
Defendant / Appellee:
CAPTAIN S. SPAULDING, Warden, FMC Devens, J. CAPPS, STEVEN VALLIS, Warden, FMC Rochester and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CARLOS ALMEDA, JR. and CARLOS ALMEDA
John McPartlin v. Rhonda Hunter, et al
as 18-10324
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JOHN MCPARTLIN
Defendant - Appellant:
RHONDA HUNTER, DR. JOSEPH CAPPS, DR. AZUCENA DUCKWORTH, In their individual capacities and others
Richard Johnson v. Capps, et al
as 18-10243
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD JAMES JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
CAPTAIN CAPPS, WARDEN SARHANI, GAIN INTELLIGENCE DEPARTMENT, James V. Allred Unit and others
Enrique Cardona v. Orlando Taylor, et al
as 17-11533
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ENRIQUE CARDONA
Defendant - Appellee:
ORLANDO TAYLOR, TIMOTHY DENNEY, LIEUTENANT BURTON and others
Benjamin Capps v. Lorie Davis, Director
as 15-41112
Petitioner / Appellant:
Benjamin Capps
Respondent / Appellee:
William Stephens, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division and Lorie Davis, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Mark Christensen v. Eddy Mejia
as 17-10001
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARK ANDREW CHRISTENSEN
Defendant - Appellee:
DOCTOR CAPPS
Benjamin Capps v. William Stephens, Director
as 15-41112
Petitioner - Appellant:
BENJAMIN CAPPS
Respondent - Appellee:
WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Stephen Haynes v. USA, et al
as 15-10381
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEPHEN D. HAYNES
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, MAUREEN CRUZ, Warden, Federal Correctional Institution Seagoville, BARBARA VON BLANCKENSEE, Assistant Warden and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
