Cases 1 - 8 of 8
State of Louisiana v. i3 Verticals
as 22-30553
Plaintiff / Appellee:
State of Louisiana, By and Through its Division of Administration, East Baton Rouge Law Enforcement District, Claiborne Parish Law Enforcement District and others
Defendant / Appellant:
i3 Verticals Incorporated, i3 Verticals, L.L.C., i3-Software & Services, L.L.C. and others
State of Louisiana v. i3 Verticals
as 22-90050
Respondent:
State of Louisiana, By and Through its Division of Administration, East Baton Rouge Law Enforcement District, Claiborne Parish Law Enforcement District and others
Petitioner:
i3 Verticals Incorporated, i3 Verticals, L.L.C., i3-Software & Services, L.L.C. and others
Bailey v. Iles
as 22-30509
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Waylon Bailey
Defendant / Appellee:
Randell Iles, in his individual capacity and Mark Wood, in his official capacity as Sheriff
Ahmond Mason v. Rapides Parish Detention Ctr I, et al
as 20-30473
Defendant / Appellee:
Rapides Parish Detention Center I, Warden Mallette, Warden Dauzat and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Ahmond Mason, also known as Ahomond Mason
Dereck Taylor, Jr. v. Rapides Prsh Deten Ctr I, et al
as 20-30424
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN DOUZAT, RAPIDES PARISH DETENTION CENTER I, WARDEN MALLETTE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DERECK D. TAYLOR, JR.
Jose Depaz-Lopez v. Corrections Corp. of America, et al
as 17-60195
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSE DEPAZ-LOPEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA, JASON RUSSELL, Medical Provider, Adams County Correctional Center, JOSEPH DIMARIA, General Practitioner, Adams County Correctional Center and others
Lawrence Ricks v. City of Alexandria, et al
as 14-30420
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LAWRENCE RICKS
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF ALEXANDRIA, JACQUES ROY, DANNY JOFFRION and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-40368
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
