Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Brandy Degaris v. Monroe County, Mississippi, et al
as 18-60478
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRANDY DEGARIS
Defendant - Appellee:
MONROE COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI, MONROE COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, SHERIFF CECIL CANTRELL, in his official capacity and others
MCI Communications Services, et al v. Amelia Telephone Corporation, et al
as 18-10787
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MCI COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES, INCORPORATED and VERIZON SELECT SERVICES INCORPORATED
Defendant - Appellee:
AMELIA TELEPHONE CORPORATION, ARVIG TELEPHON COMPANY, BADGER TELECOM INCORPORATED and others
Anthony Strong v. United States, et al
as 17-60402
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY STRONG
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF MISSISSIPPI, SHERIFF CESAR CANTRELL and MONROE COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT
Anthony Strong v. Cesar Cantrell
as 17-60071
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY STRONG
Defendant - Appellee:
CESAR CANTRELL, Monroe County Sheriff
Carlos Peterson v. Monroe County, et al
as 16-60544
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CARLOS PETERSON
Defendant - Appellee:
MONROE COUNTY and ABERDEEN, MISSISSIPPI
James Curry, Jr. v. Mississippi Dept of Corr, et al
as 13-60790
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES CURRY, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, State of Mississippi, LEE COUNTY CIRCUIT, MONROE COUNTY CIRCUIT and others
Terry Williams, Jr. v. Andrew Hood
as 09-60741
Petitioner - Appellant:
TERRY LOUIS WILLIAMS, JR.
Respondent - Appellee:
ANDREW K. HOOD, Sheriff, Monroe County, Mississippi
Reese v. Monroe Cty Shrf Dept, et al
as 08-60362
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KAWIN REESE
Defendant - Appellee:
MONROE COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT, also known as Monroe County Mississippi, CHRISTOPHER DALE GRAY, RANDY PERKINS and others
Langley, et al v. Monroe Cty Sch Dist
as 07-60326
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LAURA LANGLEY, Through her parents and next friends, Charles Langley and Kathy Langley, CHARLES LANGLEY, Individually and KATHY LANGLEY, Individually
Defendant - Appellee:
MONROE COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
