Cases 1 - 10 of 13
USA v. Detonte Spearman
as 19-10142
Defendant / Appellant:
DETONTE SPEARMAN, also known as Papa
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Eddy Spearman v. Charles Bell
as 16-41391
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDDY LEE SPEARMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
JIMMY LOCANDER
Dorothy Slade, et al v. City of Marshall Texas, et al
as 15-40517
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DOROTHY SLADE, Individually, Mother of Marcus Dewayne Slade, Deceased and as Dependent Administratrix of the Estate of Marcus Dewayne Slade, C. S. SLADE, JR., Individually, Father of Marcus Dewayne Slade, Deceased, KIM SPEARMAN, as next friend of M.S., a minor, Son of Marcus Dewayne Slade, Deceased and others
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF MARSHALL TEXAS, STANLEY SPENCE, Former Police Chief, JOHN JOHNSTON and others
Teddy Spearman v. U.S. Bureau of Prisons, et al
as 12-30124
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TEDDY L. SPEARMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
ALICE HEADSPETH and JOEL ALEXANDER
USA v. Pablo Ramirez-Cameron
as 10-40826
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
PABLO CARLOS RAMIREZ-CAMERON, also known as Pablo Ramirez-Cameron, also known as Jose Lorenzo Spearman
USA v. Pablo Ramirez-Cameron
as 10-40823
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
PABLO CARLOS RAMIREZ-CAMERON, also known as Pablo Ramirez-Cameron, also known as Jose Lorenzo Spearman
USA v. Pablo Ramirez-Cameron
as 10-40787
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PABLO CARLOS RAMIREZ-CAMERON, also known as Pablo Carlos Ramirez Camara, also known as Jose Lorenzo Spearman
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
USA v. Randi Spearman
as 09-30819
Plaintiff - Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellee:
RANDI SPEARMAN
Pablo Ramirez Camara v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 09-60600
Petitioner:
PABLO CARLOS RAMIREZ CAMARA, also known as Jose Lorenzo Spearman, also known as Pablo Carlos Ramirez Cameron
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
