Cases 1 - 10 of 310
Brockman v. Lumpkin
as 24-10523
Plaintiff:
Edward Brockman
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, Sharron Wilson, Assistant Prosecutor William Knight and others
Vela v. Compton
as 24-40302
Plaintiff:
Rodolfo Vela, Sr., Rodolfo Vela, Jr. and Anna Vela
Defendant:
Mike Compton, Sheriff, Tom Stephens, Deputy Sheriff, S. Norie, Deputy Sheriff and others
Piliego v. Montgomery
as 24-30007
Plaintiff:
Kayle J Piliego
Defendant:
Warren Montgomery, in his full capacity as District Attorney for the 22nd Judicial District, Will Macke, in his alleged official capacity as former assistant District Attorney for the 22nd Judicial District, Taylor Nicholson, in her alleged official capacity as Assiatnt District Attorney for the 22nd Judicial District and others
Woodlands Pride v. Paxton
as 23-20480
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Woodlands Pride, Incorporated, Abilene Pride Alliance, Extragrams, L.L.C. and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Warren Kenneth Paxton, In an official capacity as Attorney General of Texas, Brett Ligon, in an official capacity as District Attorney of Montgomery County, Montgomery County, Texas and others
Wolf v. City of Port Arthur
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 23-40528
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Rema Charles Wolf
Appellant:
Abraham Charles Wolf
Defendant / Appellee:
City of Port Arthur, Darlene Thomas-Pierre, Ronnie Mickens and others
USA v. Warren
as 23-60479
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Jimmy Warren
Searcy v. Paxton
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 23-40377
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Lisa Marie Searcy
Defendant / Appellee:
Texas Attorney General Warren Kenneth Paxton, Jr., Helen Truscott, Attorney, Jennifer Burnett, Attorney and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.