Cases 11 - 20 of 31
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv01107
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00991
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00830
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Williams v. Travis et al
as 3:2017cv01800
Defendant:
City of Baton Rouge, John Doe, Parish of East Feliciana and others
Plaintiff:
David Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Clark v. State of Louisiana Department of Public Safety and Corrections
as 3:2017cv00833
Defendant:
Kim Baut, State Of Louisiana and XYZ Bail Agency
Plaintiff:
Leonard Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Etienne v. EBR-COA et al
as 3:2017cv00445
Defendant:
Trudy Bihm, Tasha Clark-Amar, EBR-COA and others
Plaintiff:
Emily Robertson Etienne
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Batiste-Swilley v. City of Baton Rouge et al
as 3:2017cv00443
Defendant:
Dustin Brown, Robert Holmes, Raymond Klug and others
Plaintiff:
Lisa Batiste-Swilley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00585
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Craig v. Our Lady of the Lake Regional Medical Center et al
as 3:2015cv00814
Defendant:
William Clark, East Baton Rouge Parish Coroner's Office, Franciscan Health and Wellness Services, Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Candice Craig
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Heath v. Heath, Jr. et al
as 3:2013cv00344
Defendant:
Janice Clark, Daniel Louis Heath, Jr. and Jim Holt
Plaintiff:
Renea Sharon Denise George Daniels Heath
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
