Cases 21 - 30 of 110
The Mississippi Bar v. Johnson
as 3:2019ad00005
Interested Party:
Katherine Alexander, Sandra E Campbell and Arthur Johnston
Respondent:
Merry Caitlin Johnson
Plaintiff:
The Mississippi Bar
The Mississippi Bar v. Smith
as 3:2019ad00003
Interested Party:
Katherine Alexander, Sandra E Campbell and Arthur Johnston
Respondent:
Mark R. Smith
Plaintiff:
The Mississippi Bar
The Mississippi Bar v. Plunkett
as 3:2019ad00001
Interested Party:
Katherine Alexander, Sandra E Campbell and Arthur Johnston
Respondent:
Sharon G. Plunkett
Plaintiff:
The Mississippi Bar
The Mississippi Bar v. Thomas
as 3:2019ad00002
Interested Party:
Katherine Alexander, Sandra E Campbell and Arthur Johnston
Respondent:
John R. Thomas
Plaintiff:
The Mississippi Bar
The Mississippi Bar v. Ross
as 3:2018ad00005
Interested Party:
Katherine Alexander, Sandra E Campbell and Arthur Johnston
Respondent:
Matthew Ross
Plaintiff:
The Mississippi Bar
The Mississippi Bar v. Lee
as 3:2018ad00004
Interested Party:
Katherine Alexander, Sandra E Campbell and Arthur Johnston
Respondent:
John W. Lee, Jr.
Plaintiff:
The Mississippi Bar
Sawyer v. Campbell et al
as 5:2018cv00110
Defendant:
Natchez Casino OpCo, LLC, Zurich American Insurance Company and Clement Campbell
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Sawyer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Campbell et al v. Pizza Hut of America, LLC et al
as 3:2018cv00688
Plaintiff:
Tracy Campbell and William Campbell
Defendant:
YUM! Brands, Inc., John and Jane Does 1-10 and Pizza Hut of America, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Campbell v. Mooney et al
as 5:2018cv00105
Defendant:
James Mooney and Zurich American Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Clement Campbell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. Hearn et al
as 3:2018cv00594
Defendant:
Jerry W. Campbell, James L. Penly, Johnny Price and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department and Sheriff Martin Pace
Plaintiff:
Brian Mitchell Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
