Cases 1 - 10 of 58
Smith v. Mississippi Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2011cv00797
Plaintiff:
Pamela Smith
Defendant:
Mississippi Department of Corrections, Christopher Epps, Lawrence Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jordan v. First et al
as 3:2011cv00354
Plaintiff:
Lonnie L. Jordan
Defendant:
Albert First, Lawrence Kelly and Christopher Epps
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Kelly et al
as 2:2010cv00271
Plaintiff:
Marcus Dewayne Davis
Defendant:
Lawrence Kelly, Ronald King, Regina Hancock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lewis v. Kelly
as 1:2010cv00313
Plaintiff:
Joseph Samuel Lewis
Defendant:
Lawrence Kelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Womack v. Kelly
as 3:2010cv00131
Plaintiff:
Larry Womack
Defendant:
Lawrence Kelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Babb v. Kelly
as 3:2010cv00048
Plaintiff:
Johnny Robert Babb
Defendant:
Lawrence Kelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Puckett v. Epps, et al
as 2:2004cv00302
Plaintiff:
Larry Matthew Puckett
Defendant:
Christopher B Epps and Lawrence Kelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Colter v. Kelly et al
as 4:2009cv00170
Plaintiff:
Michael Herbert Colter
Defendant:
Lawrence Kelly, Robert Scott and Attorney General of the State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Glidden v. Kelly et al
as 1:2009cv00760
Plaintiff:
Gary Allen Glidden
Defendant:
Lawrence Kelly and Robert Scott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Billiot v. Thigpen, et al
as 1:1986cv00549
Petitioner:
James E. Billiot
Respondent:
Christopher B Epps and Lawrence Kelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
