Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Sigford v. Hickman et al
as 9:2023cv00042
Plaintiff:
Destiny R. Sigford
Defendant:
Eugene Hickman, Amanda Lewis, Jessica Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Galyeon v. State of Texas et al
as 6:2021cv00410
Plaintiff:
Milisa Foster Galyeon
Defendant:
State of Texas, Texas Department of Family And Protective Services, Robert Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kirschner v. Texas Department of Family And Protective Services et al
as 4:2021cv00469
Defendant:
Timothy Alexander, Linda Risinger and Texas Department of Family And Protective Services
Plaintiff:
Susan Kirschner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Roland v. State Of Texas et al
as 4:2021cv00415
Defendant:
Sherry Shipman, Texas Department of Family And Protective Services, State Of Texas and others
Plaintiff:
Teri Anna Roland
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2020cv00597
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 623
Bird v. Fletcher et al
as 9:2019cv00220
Defendant:
Pam Fletcher, William Pemberton, Sarah Clark and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Bird
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv00356
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Carman v. County of Collin, Texas et al
as 4:2018cv00717
Defendant:
Stephen Howell, Cie Gardez, Kalyn Rosser and others
Plaintiff:
Amy Carman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2015cv00359
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Porcayo v. Department of Family and Protective Services et al
as 6:2013cv00713
Plaintiff:
Saul Lino Porcayo
Defendant:
Department of Family and Protective Services, Larry G Reeves, Travis Brazelle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
