Cases 1 - 10 of 213
The State of Texas v. Graham
as 3:2024cv00844
Plaintiff:
The State of Texas
Defendant:
Christopher Lauren Graham
Glaspie v. Flory et al
as 3:2024cv00370
Plaintiff:
Kevin Neal Glaspie
Defendant:
Craig Flory, S Sprabery, FNU Graham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Graham v. United States Postal Service et al
as 7:2024cv00020
Plaintiff:
Roberta Graham
Defendant:
United States Postal Service and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Graham v. Pippens et al
as 3:2023cv02850
Plaintiff:
Gene Graham
Defendant:
Makisha Pippens, DHA and Laurin Compton
McMillan et al v. Westcor Land Title Insurance Company
as 4:2023cv01265
Plaintiff:
Graham McMillan and Claire McMillan
Defendant:
Westcor Land Title Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Cathey et al v. AssuredPartners of Texas LLC
as 3:2023cv02831
Plaintiff:
Thomas Graham Cathey and Ronald Cathey
Defendant:
AssuredPartners of Texas LLC
Other:
ADR Provider
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgment
Graham v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2023cv01072
Petitioner:
John Carlton Graham
Respondent:
TDCJ and Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mullins v Graham et al
as 4:2023cv01004
Plaintiff:
Sharda L. Mullins
Defendant:
Sergeant C. Graham, Chief Deputy B. Caver, S. Sprabary and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00984
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Graham v. Waybourn
as 4:2023cv00907
Petitioner:
Gladys Maria Graham
Respondent:
Unknown Defendants (4:23-CV-907-O) and Warden Bill Waybourn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
