Cases 1 - 10 of 77
Kabisch v. CONTI Texas Organization, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00281
Plaintiff:
Joshua Kabisch
Defendant:
RealPage, Inc., Thoma Bravo Fund XIII, L.P., Thoma Bravo Fund XIV, L.P. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00110
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Bonds v. Jones
as 23-90001
Petitioner:
Anthony Bonds
Respondent:
Sherman Jones, in his individual capacity, Justin Barnes, in his individual capacity and Bayou Correctional Management Company, L.L.C.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv02749
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv01243
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Aaron Lamar Livingston Trust et al v. McCraig et al
as 4:2022cv03021
Plaintiff:
Aaron Lamar Livingston Trust, Sherman-D'Wayne Waller and Ahron-Azriel Livingston-Bey
Defendant:
Albert M McCraig, Jr, Gary Chaney, Sean Whittmore and others
USA v. Moore
as 22-10412
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Sherman Moore
Johnson v. Chesapeake Louisiana
as 22-90020
Petitioner:
Allen Johnson, Linda Johnson, Donald A. Crosslin, Jr. and others
Respondent:
Chesapeake Louisiana, L.P. and Chesapeake Operating, L.L.C.
Filed in Error
as 4:2022mc01094
Plaintiff:
Incorrectly Filed
Defendant:
Ruth R. Hughs, Lizzie Pannill Fletcher, Al Green and others
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888 Other Statutory Actions
Allen v. Sherman Operating
as 21-40913
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Carolyn Sue Allen and Christopher James Allen
Defendant / Appellee:
Sherman Operating Company, L.L.C., doing business as Texoma Healthcare
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
