Cases 1 - 10 of 1,490
USA v. Bonilla-Carbajal
as 24-50473
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Daniel Bonilla-Carbajal
Clark et al v. Mangham et al
as 5:2024cv00770
Plaintiff:
Mr & Mrs Larry E Clark and L & M Hair Care Products Inc
Defendant:
Mangham Hardy Rolfs & Abadie, Terrence J Donahue, Sr, Charles McBride and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Bird v. KRONOS SOLAR, LLC et al
as 5:2024cv00513
Plaintiff:
Daniel Bird
Defendant:
KRONOS SOLAR, LLC and PACKRONOS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Jakeway v. Schneider et al
as 4:2024cv01090
Defendant:
Lawrence M. Schneider, Laurence M. Schneider, Adam N. Schneider and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Donald Jakeway
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
Brown v. Abney
as 3:2024cv01109
Plaintiff:
Madeline Nicole Brown
Defendant:
Daniel Eugene Abney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
USA v. Perez-Perez
as 24-40316
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Angel Daniel Perez-Perez, also known as Josue Lopez-Irias
Thiels v. Berger et al
as 4:2024cv01668
Plaintiff:
Daniel Thiels
Defendant:
William J. Berger, Robert L. Lane, Nora Mead Brownell and others
Ortega v. Fields et al
as 5:2024cv00440
Plaintiff:
Mark Anthony Ortega
Defendant:
Daniel Gilbert Fields and Eric Doe
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
G&G Closed Circuit Events, LLC v. Up in Smoke Inc et al
as 4:2024cv00387
Plaintiff:
G&G Closed Circuit Events, LLC
Defendant:
Up in Smoke Inc doing business as Up in Smoke doing business as Up in Smoke Private Club Lewisville, Daniel L. Schmitt doing business as Up in Smoke doing business as Up in Smoke Private Club Lewisville, Carol A. Schmitt doing business as Up in Smoke doing business as Up in Smoke Private Club Lewisville and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
