Cases 211 - 220 of 821
Jones v. J.S.B
as 5:2016cv00512
Respondent:
J.S.B
Petitioner:
Taylor U. Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Idelfonso Ipina v Alamo Concrete Products Company
as 5:2016cv00505
Defendant:
Alamo Concrete Products, Ltd.
Plaintiff:
Idelfonso Ipina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Family & Medical Leave Act
Seif et al v. State of Louisiana through the Military Department State of Louisiana et al
as 3:2016cv00315
Plaintiff:
Liusa Bawol, Lisa Blaylock, Destiny Flynn and others
Defendant:
Louisiana National Guard and State of Louisiana Through the Military Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Campbell v. Hampton et al
as 4:2016cv00076
Petitioner:
Thomas Edward Campbell
Respondent:
Sharon Hampton, Barbra Johnson, Anthony Compton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Morgan v. United States of America
as 1:2016cv00495
Plaintiff:
Caroline Morgan
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Tave v. Blakemore et al
as 4:2016cv00278
Plaintiff:
Amber Tave
Defendant:
Preston Blakemore , United States Postal Service and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Bruce v. Baywater Drilling, L.L.C.
as 3:2016cv00168
Defendant:
Baywater Drilling, L.L.C.
Plaintiff:
Melvin Bruce, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688 Jones Act
McCormick v. New Orleans Public Belt Railroad Commission
as 2:2016cv01897
Plaintiff:
Troy McCormick
Defendant:
New Orleans Public Belt Railroad Commission
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Miller v. Alabama Great Southern Railroad Company
as 2:2016cv00025
Plaintiff:
Mona Shea Miller
Defendant:
Alabama Great Southern Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Klay Abbott v. BNSF Railway Company
as 16-40230
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KLAY ABBOTT
Defendant - Appellee:
BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
