Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Coppock et al v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company et al
as 2:2024cv00944
Plaintiff:
Ernest Coppock and Dimetrius White
Defendant:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY and Illinois Central Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Poston v. Ace Insurance Co et al
as 5:2017cv00486
Plaintiff:
John Poston
Defendant:
Ace Insurance Co, Safeway Insurance Co, Kansas City Southern Railway Co and others
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
White v. Kansas City Southern Railway
as 5:2015cv02287
Defendant:
Kansas City Southern Railway
Plaintiff:
Gabriel White
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
White et al v. Port Terminal Railroad Association et al
as 4:2013cv01947
Defendant:
Port Terminal Railroad Association , Union Pacific Railroad Company and BNSF Railway Company
Plaintiff:
Wayne E White and Baldemar O Garcia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
White v. Textron, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv00695
Plaintiff:
Michael L. White
Defendant:
Randall E Bray, Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, Textron, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Charlotte White v. USA
as 10-31083
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLOTTE N. WHITE
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
White v. United States of America
as 2:2010cv03067
Plaintiff:
Charlotte N. White
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2679
Almeida et al v. USA et al
as 2:2009cv02161
Plaintiff:
Peter White Almeida, Peter White Almeida, Erlinda Marie Almeida and others
Defendant:
Costello, USA and Elizabeth Azel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271 Federal Tort Claims Act
Almeida et al v. Azel et al
as 1:2009cv02161
Plaintiff:
Peter White Almeida and Erlinda Marie Almeida
Defendant:
Elizebeth Azel and Costello
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271 Federal Tort Claims Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
