Cases 21 - 30 of 115
Thyme v. Oracle Corportation
as 1:2022cv01089
Plaintiff:
Arthur Thyme and Franklin Wright
Defendant:
Oracle Corportation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Kijakazi et al
as 7:2022cv00227
Plaintiff:
Franklin C. Smith
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi, Andrezo M. Saul, Virginia Dept. of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Franklin v City of Belton
as 6:2022cv01071
Plaintiff:
Brandi Franklin
Defendant:
City of Belton, Texas and Daniel Aguirre
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Partain et al
as 7:2022cv00234
Plaintiff:
Franklin C. Smith
Defendant:
Sabrina Partain, Sasaria Baeza and Unknown Black Female
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Desantis et al
as 6:2022cv00057
Plaintiff:
Franklin C Smith
Defendant:
Ron Desantis, Benjamin Crump, Jason L Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Simms v. US Customs and Border Protection et al
as 7:2022cv00316
Plaintiff:
Franklin Shane Simms
Defendant:
US Customs and Border Protection and CIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Walker v. Ford et al
as 5:2022cv00203
Plaintiff:
Marlon Franklin Walker
Defendant:
Jason Ford, George Bush, Gene Messer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Eurings v. Cantrell et al
as 2:2022cv02232
Plaintiff:
Joseph Eurings
Defendant:
Latoya Cantrell, Shaun Ferguson, Jacob Tucker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Franklin v. Knowles
as 4:2022cv00168
Plaintiff:
Ephesian Johnny Franklin
Defendant:
Beyonce Giselle Knowles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lofton v. Franklin County Mississippi et al
as 5:2022cv00052
Plaintiff:
Ethan Lofton
Defendant:
Franklin County Mississippi, Amite County Mississippi and John Does 1 - 10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
