Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Buchanan v. USA
as 24-50194
Plaintiff:
Rickey Buchanan, Sr.
Defendant:
United States of America, Department of the Army, Department of the Air Force and others
Buchanan v. United States of America et al
as 5:2023cv00663
Plaintiff:
Rickey Buchanan
Defendant:
United States of America, Department of the Army, Department of the Air Force and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ebrahimi v. Fields et al
as 3:2023cv00273
Plaintiff:
Shamim Ebrahimi
Defendant:
Michael R. Fields, Netflix, Inc., Electronic Arts, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Sparks v. Torres et al
as 6:2022cv00392
Plaintiff:
Michael Lynn Sparks
Defendant:
Major Claudia I. Torres, Carl R. Darnall Army Medical Center and Department of the Army
Sparks v. Torres et al
as 6:2022cv00290
Plaintiff:
Michael Lynn Sparks
Defendant:
Major Claudia I. Torres, Carl R. Darnall Army Medical Center and Department of the Army
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Abbott v. Biden et al
as 6:2022cv00003
Plaintiff:
Greg Abbott and Mike Dunleavy
Defendant:
Joseph R. Biden, Department of Defense, Lloyd Austin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Jones v. Speer et al
as 5:2020cv00160
Defendant:
Department of the Army and Robert M. Speer
Plaintiff:
Stacy Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Johnson v. Department of the Army
as 6:2018cv00178
Defendant:
Department of the Army
Plaintiff:
Ms. Theresa Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491
Rittgers vs. United States of America, et al.
as 2:2015cv00094
Plaintiff:
Colbert Rittgers
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Department Of The Army and John McHugh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674
Dawn Moore-Ahmed v. John McHugh
as 14-41352
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAWN MOORE-AHMED
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN MCHUGH, Secretary of the Army, Department of the Army
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
