Cases 51 - 60 of 528
Milwaukee Electric Tool Corporation v. SEC Transport LLC
as 4:2022cv04172
Plaintiff:
Milwaukee Electric Tool Corporation
Defendant:
SEC Transport LLC and Techtronic Industries
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Tanali Family Trust v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
as 1:2022cv00154
Defendant:
Tanali Family Trust and United Parcel Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
McGee v. Potier et al
as 6:2022cv05963
Plaintiff:
Aaron Frank McGee
Defendant:
Kevin Potier, Acadiana Movers L L C, American Transfer & Storage Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
World Wide Logistics US, Inc. v. Surinder Trucking LLC
as 4:2022cv00901
Plaintiff:
World Wide Logistics US, Inc.
Defendant:
Surinder Trucking LLC
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 81 Damaged Goods While Being Transported
Jax Transportation Logistics, LLC v. 61 Transport, LLC
as 4:2022cv03227
Plaintiff:
Jax Transportation Logistics, LLC
Defendant:
61 Transport, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Property Damage
Ohio Security Insurance Company v. FedEx Freight Inc
as 3:2022cv02073
Plaintiff:
Ohio Security Insurance Company as Subrogee of Western Tech Systems, Inc. and Ohio Security Insurance Company
Defendant:
FedEx Freight, Inc. and FedEx Freight Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Interstate Commerce Act
Corroy Consulting Company GmbH v. Gold U.S. Transportation, Inc. et al
as 4:2022cv02880
Plaintiff:
Corroy Consulting Company GmbH
Defendant:
Gold U.S. Transportation, Inc. d/b/a Gold US Trans, Inc., HLI Logistics, LLC and Gold U.S. Transportation, Inc. doing business as Gold US Trans, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Stavis v. One Technologies
as 22-10764
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Myles Stavis
Defendant / Appellant:
One Technologies, L.L.C.
Berman v. Allied Van Lines Inc et al
as 2:2022cv02557
Plaintiff:
Linda Berman
Defendant:
Allied Van Lines Inc and Ideal Move, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Interstate Commerce Act
Hankins v. Reynolds
as 2:2022cv00150
Plaintiff:
Kevin R Hankins
Defendant:
James Reynolds, Sugar Express and James Reynolds Individually and doing business as Sugar Express
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1337 Sherman-Clayton Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
