Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Industrial Recycling & Demolition Inc v. Direct Connect Logistix Inc et al
as 3:2024cv00655
Plaintiff:
Industrial Recycling & Demolition Inc
Defendant:
Direct Connect Logistix Inc, Hoosier Logistics L L C, P N M Transportation L L C and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Industrial Recycling & Demolition, Inc. v. Direct Connect Logistix, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00089
Plaintiff:
Industrial Recycling & Demolition, Inc.
Defendant:
Direct Connect Logistix, Inc., Hoosier Logistics, LLC, P.N.M. Transportation, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Arnold et al v. Allied Van Lines, Inc. et al
as 5:2021cv00438
Defendant:
Sirva Relocation, LLC, Coleman American Moving Services, Inc., Allied Van Lines, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Linda Arnold and Michael Arnold
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Superior MRI Services, Inc., et al v. Alliance Healthcare Svcs, Inc., et al
as 14-60087
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SUPERIOR MRI SERVICES, INCORPORATED and SUPERIOR MRI SERVICES, INCORPORATED, AS SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST OF PL CONTRACTING, INCORPORATED
Defendant - Appellee:
ALLIANCE HEALTHCARE SERVICES, INCORPORATED, formerly known as Alliance Imaging, Incorporated, doing business as Alliance Imaging, ALLIANCE IMAGING, INCORPORATED and JOHN DOE, Defendants I Through X
Superior MRI Services, Inc. v. Alliance Healthcare Services, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv00113
Plaintiff:
Superior MRI Services, Inc.
Defendant:
Alliance Healthcare Services, Inc., Alliance Imaging, Inc. and John Doe Defendants I Through X
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Sturgis et al v. Ollivier Dispatch et al
as 3:2009cv00636
Plaintiff:
Yvette Sturgis, Yvette Sturgis, Yvonne Counce and others
Defendant:
Ollivier Dispatch, Fabrice Lermine, Leda Decors and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
