Cases 11 - 20 of 105
Stewart v. Hill
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 23-10111
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Albert G. Hill, III, individually, and as a Beneficiary of the Margaret Hunt Trust Estate, derivatively on behalf of the Margaret Hunt Trust Estate, individually, As a beneficiary of the Haroldson Lafayette Hunt Jr. Trust Estate, and derivately on Be
Defendant / Appellee:
William Schilling, individually and in his capacity as a member of the Advisory Board MHTE and a member of the Advisory Board of the HHTE, Ivan Irwin, Jr., Alinda H. Wikert and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
Marco Antonio Montemayor, Esq. and Kenneth Robert Stewart, Jr., also known as Kenneth R. Stewart, Jr.
Hill v. Hunt et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 3:2007cv02020
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Erin Nance Hill, Melrose Properties, LLC, THH Properties Limited Partnership and others
Trustee:
Peggy Allison, Regions Bank, Chester Donnally and others
Defendant:
Lyda Hill, Ivan Irwin, Jr, Haroldson Lafayette Hunt Jr Trust Estate and others
Petitioner:
Shamoun & Norman, LLP, Tom M Dees, III, Ellen Flowers and others
Plaintiff:
Albert G Hill, III
Interested Party:
XTO Energy Inc., Jonathan Nockels, David Evans and others
Respondent:
The Aldous Law Firm, Albert G. Hill, III and R. Dean Gresham
Guardian Ad Litem:
Guardian Ad Litem
Intervenor:
Calloway Norris Burdette & Weber PLLC, Blind Faith Speculation LLC and Campbell Harrison & Dagley LLP
Receiver:
Daniel L Jackson
Not Classified By Court:
ADR Provider
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Racketeering (RICO) Act
D&T Partners v. Baymark Partners
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 22-11148
Plaintiff / Appellant:
D&T Partners, L.L.C., successor in interest to ACET Venture Partners, L.L.C., directly and derivatively on behalf of ACET Global, L.L.C. and Baymark ACET Holdco, L.L.C. and ACET Global, L.L.C.
Defendant / Appellee:
Baymark Partners Management, L.L.C., Super G Capital, L.L.C., SG Credit Partners, Incorporated and others
Guardino v. Hart
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 22-20278
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Kristin Guardino
Defendant / Appellee:
Jim Hart, Sean H. McCarthy, John Eddie Williams, Jr. and others
Guardino v. Hart et al
as 4:2021cv03721
Plaintiff:
Kristin Guardino
Defendant:
Jim Hart, Sean H McCarthy, John Eddie Williams, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Williams v. USAA Federal Savings Bank
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 3:2022cv00990
Plaintiff:
Jack Williams
Defendant:
USAA Federal Savings Bank
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Gross v. Stufflebean et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 3:2021cv03145
Plaintiff:
Daro B Gross
Defendant:
Jocelyn Michels Stufflebean, John Stufflebean, Mieke Strand and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Gross v. Stufflebean et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 3:2021cv03107
Plaintiff:
Daro B Gross
Defendant:
Jocelyn Michels Stufflebean, John Stufflebean, David I Gross and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
v. Stufflebean et al
as 3:2021xc03148
Not Classified By Court:
Lauren E Jones
Defendant:
Jocelyn Michels Stufflebean, John Stufflebean, David Gross and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
v. Stufflebean et al
as 3:2021xc03147
Defendant:
Jocelyn Michels Stufflebean, John Stufflebean, David I Gross and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.