General Cases filed in the Fifth Circuit Courts
Cases 111 - 120 of 66,672
Garcia v. Lumpkin
as 5:2024cv00259
Petitioner: Antonio Andres Garcia
Respondent: Director of TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Joe v. LNU 3:24-CV-1072
as 3:2024cv01072
Petitioner: Demarcus Kenard Joe
Respondent: FNU LNU 3:24-CV-1072
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Barnes v. TDCJ
as 3:2024cv01038
Petitioner: MonQuas Barnes
Respondent: Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Anderson v. Lumpkin We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2024cv01681
Petitioner: DLance Chazion Anderson
Respondent: Director Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pradia v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv01045
Petitioner: Nathaniel Pradia
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Garcia-Varela v. Withers
as 3:2024cv00134
Plaintiff: Oscar Garcia-Varela
Defendant: Shannon D. Withers
Interested Party: Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Hays v. Hooper
as 3:2024cv00579
Plaintiff: Cameron Hays
Defendant: Tim Hooper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ashlock v. Coke County Sheriff
as 5:2024cv00112
Petitioner: Calvin Ashlock
Respondent: Coke County Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Saucedo v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 2:2024cv00090
Petitioner: Bobby Saucedo
Respondent: Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nunez v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 9:2024cv00086
Petitioner: Albino Nunez
Respondent: Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?