Cases 11 - 20 of 447
Garcia v. Unknown
as 2:2023cv00194
Petitioner:
Daniel Gilbert Garcia
Respondent:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Politte v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
as 4:2023cv02535
Petitioner:
Daniel Mark Politte
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Martin v. Busby
as 2:2023cv00139
Petitioner:
Daniel Neal Martin
Respondent:
Larry R Busby
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Ixta v. United States of America
as 4:2023cv00436
Petitioner:
Daniel Ixta
Respondent:
United States of America and Freddy Garrido, Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Lampkin v. Cox
as 6:2023cv00174
Petitioner:
Esaw Lampkin
Respondent:
State of Texas ADA Daniel Cox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Miller v. Salmonson
as 5:2023cv00037
Petitioner:
Daniel Miller
Respondent:
Warden Salmonson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Green v. Warden Parcker
as 4:2023cv00577
Petitioner:
James Daniel Green
Respondent:
Warden Parcker and Bobby Lumpkin, Director, TDCJ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Moaney v. Lumpkin
as 6:2023cv00072
Petitioner:
Richard Daniel Mooney, IV and Richard Daniel Moaney
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Murphy v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 3:2022cv02887
Petitioner:
Patrick Daniel Murphy
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Elliston v. Hillhouse
as 6:2022cv00454
Petitioner:
Daniel Christopher Elliston
Respondent:
Botie Hillhouse
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
