Cases 11 - 18 of 18
Alegria v. Warden, FCI Forrest City et al
as 1:2010cv00241
Petitioner:
Jose Alegria, Jr.
Respondent:
Attorney General of the United States and Warden, FCI Forrest City
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Liningham v. Terrell et al
as 6:2010cv00068
Respondent:
Attorney General of the United States and Warden Duke Terrell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Alva v. Attorney General of the United States et al
as 5:2009cv00145
Petitioner:
Jose Antonio Monsiva Alva
Respondent:
Attorney General of the United States, Department of Homeland Security and Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Wall et al v. Pearson et al
as 5:2008cv00319
Plaintiff:
Robert Wall
Defendant:
Bruce Pearson and Attorney General for the United States of America
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Banks et al v. Pearson et al
as 5:2008cv00313
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks and Robert Wall
Defendant:
Bruce Pearson and Attorney General for the United States of America
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Saldana v. Attorney General of the United States et al
as 1:2008cv00223
Petitioner:
Francisco Saldana
Respondent:
Attorney General of the United States, UP Fox, United States Attorney's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Davis v. Bush, et al
as 07-51224
Petitioner - Appellant:
TONY ROBERT DAVIS
Respondent - Appellee:
GEORGE W BUSH, In His Official Capacity as the President of the United States, MICHAEL B MUKASEY, U S ATTORNEY GENERAL, In His Official Capacity as the Attorney General of the United States, BUREAU OF PRISONS and others
Maringo v. Department of Homeland Security et al
as 4:2007cv01878
Petitioner:
Denis Maringo
Respondent:
Department of Homeland Security and Attorney General Of The United States
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Right to Privacy Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
