Cases 21 - 30 of 36
Pierce v. State of Mississippi et al
as 3:2013cv00049
Petitioner:
Jairie T. Pierce, Jr.
Respondent:
State of Mississippi and Attorney General of the State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Colton Pitonyak v. Rick Thaler, Director, et al
as 12-50800
Petitioner - Appellant:
COLTON PITONYAK
Respondent - Appellee:
RICK THALER, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION and BILL PIERCE
Pierce v. Director TDCJ-CID
as 5:2012cv00061
Petitioner:
Clarence Lodell Pierce
Respondent:
Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Roy Pierce v. Rick Thaler, Director
as 11-41316
Petitioner - Appellant:
ROY GENE PIERCE
Respondent - Appellee:
RICK THALER, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Pierce v. Director
as 9:2011cv00075
Petitioner:
Roy Gene Pierce
Respondent:
TDCJ-ID Director
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Thomas Pierce v. Rick Thaler, Director, et al
as 10-10978
Petitioner - Appellant:
THOMAS MICHAEL PIERCE
Respondent - Appellee:
RICK THALER, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION and CHARLES RYAN, Director, Arizona State Prison
Pierce v. Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID
as 4:2010cv00408
Petitioner:
Thomas Michael Pierce
Respondent:
Rick Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Shannon v. Holder et al
as 1:2009cv00187
Petitioner:
Pierce Leo Shannon
Respondent:
Eric Holder, Harley G Lappin, Rodney Chandler and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Pierce v. Cain
as 09-30108
Petitioner - Appellant:
JAMES C PIERCE
Respondent - Appellee:
BURL CAIN, WARDEN, LOUISIANA STATE PENITENTIARY
Pierce v. Holder
as 08-50435
Petitioner - Appellant:
JACKIE LEROY PIERCE
Respondent - Appellee:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.