Cases 21 - 30 of 503
McBride v. Lumpkin
as 5:2023cv00795
Petitioner:
Kirk Wayne McBride, Sr.
Respondent:
Director-TDCJ-CID Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Holden v. Bickham
as 23-30326
Petitioner / Appellant:
Eric J. Holden, Sr.
Respondent / Appellee:
Edward Bickham, Warden, Dixon Correctional Institute
Williams v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 2:2023cv00080
Petitioner:
Jaylan Rochard Williams, Sr
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Austin v. Day
as 23-30269
Petitioner / Appellant:
Wesley Shane Austin, Sr.
Respondent / Appellee:
Travis Day, Warden, B. B. Rayburn Correctional Center
Morris v. Lumpkin
as 23-40228
Petitioner / Appellant:
Kevin Ray Morris, Sr.
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Williams v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 1:2023cv00144
Petitioner:
Jaylan Rochard Williams, Sr
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 1:2023cv00145
Petitioner:
Jaylan Rochard Williams, Sr
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Lumpkin
as 23-10287
Petitioner / Appellant:
Kevin Jerome Jones
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, R. Bowers, Sr Warden, NFN Wonders and others
Corney v. Townsend
as 6:2023cv00039
Petitioner:
Patrick Corney
Respondent:
Sr. Warden Lonnie Townsend
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Selmon v. Tarrant County Jail
as 4:2023cv00065
Petitioner:
Stephen Dewayne Selmon, Sr.
Respondent:
Tarrant County Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
