Cases 31 - 40 of 42
David Kates v. Joe Keffer, Warden
as 09-30539
Petitioner - Appellant:
DAVID EARL KATES
Respondent - Appellee:
JOE KEFFER, Warden, United States Penitentiary
Lyons v. Farmer et al
as 1:2009cv00115
Petitioner:
David Earl Lyons
Respondent:
Mike Farmer and Attorney General of the State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Majors v. United States Of America
as 6:2009cv00092
Petitioner:
David Earl Majors
Respondent:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Majors v. Tamez
as 4:2009cv00149
Petitioner:
David Earl Majors
Respondent:
Rebecca Tamez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Hunter v. Quarterman
as 3:2008cv01169
Petitioner:
David Earl Hunter
Respondent:
Nathaniel Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Flowers v. Jefferson County Judicial System
as 1:2007cv00972
Petitioner:
David Earl Flowers
Respondent:
Jefferson County Judicial System
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Flowers v. Jefferson County Judicial System
as 1:2007cv00973
Petitioner:
David Earl Flowers
Respondent:
Jefferson County Judicial System
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Flowers v. Jefferson County Correctional Facility
as 1:2007cv00485
Petitioner:
David Earl Flowers
Respondent:
Jefferson County Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Phillips v. Director of TDCJ-CID
as 9:2007cv00112
Plaintiff:
David Earl Phillips
Respondent:
Director of TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Phillips v. Director of TDCJ-CID
as 9:2007cv00110
Petitioner:
David Earl Phillips
Respondent:
Director of TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
