Cases 41 - 50 of 640
Lavergne v. Hooper
as 23-30168
Petitioner / Appellant:
Brandon Scott Lavergne
Respondent / Appellee:
Tim Hooper, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary
Crosby v. Day
as 5:2023cv00351
Plaintiff:
Michael Scott Crosby
Defendant:
Travis Day
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kinard v. Sollie
as 3:2023cv00156
Plaintiff:
Tyler Scott Kinard
Defendant:
Billie Sollie
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Scott v. Colbert
as 3:2023cv00111
Plaintiff:
Charles Scott
Defendant:
Warden Unknown Colbert
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
McGowan v. Ballard
as 3:2023cv00023
Petitioner:
Scott Ross McGowan
Respondent:
Ben Ballard and Merrick Garland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Scott v. The State of Mississippi
as 3:2022cv00746
Plaintiff:
Donny M. Scott
Defendant:
The State of Mississippi
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Cavett v. Lumpkin
as 1:2022cv01042
Petitioner:
Bryan Scott Cavett
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jordan v. Lumpkin
as 4:2022cv03519
Petitioner:
Randall Scott Jordan
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Berryman v. Cain et al
as 1:2022cv00140
Petitioner:
Brian Scott Berryman
Respondent:
Burl Cain and Mississippi Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Lumpkin
as 6:2022cv01005
Petitioner:
Anthony Scott Johnson
Respondent:
TDCJ Director Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
