Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Miller v. G.C.R.C.F. et al
as 1:2022cv00351
Plaintiff:
Ray Charles Miller
Defendant:
G.C.R.C.F., Bobby C. Fairley, Burie Caine and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Straney v. Sawyer et al
as 1:2022cv00001
Plaintiff:
Christopher Straney
Defendant:
Kathleen H Sawyer, Deborah G Schult and John and Jane Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Bone v. Skinner et al
as 4:2021cv00501
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Dr. Michael Mixon and Sheriff Jim Skinner
Plaintiff:
James Erle Bone
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Martinez v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 1:2021cv00042
Respondent:
Jane Doe, FNU Lopez, B Wallace and others
Petitioner:
Ricardo A Martinez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Umarbaev et al v. Moore et al
as 3:2020cv01279
Defendant:
Matthew T Albence, Marc J Moore, Warden Jimmy Johnson and others
Petitioner:
Lee Alejandro Espinoza Urbina, Edgar Haro Osuna, Kirk Golding and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Nabaya v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 3:2019cv02849
Respondent:
Jane Doe Braham, John Doe Perez and Bureau of Prisons
Petitioner:
Shapat Nabaya
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Boddie v. Nash et al
as 3:2018cv00390
Plaintiff:
Willie Boddie
Defendant:
Cheron Nash and John and Jane Does 1-100
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Fields v. Ms. Dept. of Corrections et al
as 1:2015cv00345
Plaintiff:
Brandon Earl Fields
Defendant:
Ms. Dept. of Corrections , South MS. Corr. Institute , Marshall Fisher and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Vera v. Rupert et al
as 6:2015cv00713
Plaintiff:
Eloy Vera
Defendant:
John Rupert, Michael Roark, Michael Collum and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams et al v. Jones, et al
as 1:2014cv00353
Plaintiff:
Shannon D Williams
Defendant:
FNU Jones, Jane Doe and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
