Cases 1 - 10 of 219
Thompson v. Cain et al
as 1:2024cv00091
Petitioner:
Dennis Thompson
Respondent:
Burl Cain and Lynn Fitch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thompson v. Cain et al
as 3:2024cv00215
Plaintiff:
Dennis Thompson
Defendant:
Burl Cain and Lynn Fitch
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thompson v. Rekosky
as 4:2024cv01389
Petitioner:
Rodney Lee Thompson
Respondent:
Alejandro Mayorkas and Warden E Rekosky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Thompson v. Lumpkin
as 24-20078
Petitioner:
Overille Denton Thompson, Jr.
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Thompson v. Lumpkin
as 4:2023cv03656
Petitioner:
Ernest Charles Thompson
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thompson v. Lubbock County Sheriff
as 5:2023cv00228
Petitioner:
Jesse Thompson
Respondent:
Lubbock County Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Thompson v. Warden, FCI Beaumont Medium
as 1:2023cv00245
Petitioner:
Kendrick Wayne Thompson
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Beaumont Medium
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Thompson v. Lumpkin
as 23-20182
Petitioner / Appellant:
Overille Denton Thompson, Jr.
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Thompson v. Lumpkin
as 23-20088
Petitioner / Appellant:
Lawrence Edward Thompson
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Thompson v. McClure
as 1:2022cv00129
Petitioner:
Paul Thompson
Respondent:
Superintendent Marcus McClure
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
