Cases 1 - 10 of 115
Baker v. MTC et al
as 3:2024cv01330
Petitioner:
Ajalon Baker
Respondent:
MTC, TDCJ, FNU Rayford and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Baker v. Sheriff, Jefferson County
as 1:2024cv00193
Petitioner:
Thomas C. Baker
Respondent:
Sheriff, Jefferson County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Baker v. Sheriff, Jefferson County
as 1:2024cv00173
Petitioner:
Thomas C. Baker
Respondent:
Sheriff, Jefferson County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Baker v. Jefferson County Sheriff
as 1:2024cv00160
Petitioner:
Thomas C. Baker
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Baker v. Lumpkin
as 24-50153
Petitioner:
Stanley Foster Baker
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Baker v. Warden, FCI Beaumont Medium
as 1:2023cv00378
Petitioner:
John James Baker
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Beaumont Medium
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Baker v. United States of America
as 4:2023cv00829
Petitioner:
John James Baker
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Baker v. Gonzalez
as 4:2023cv00967
Petitioner:
Alan T. Baker
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Baker v. Lumpkin
as 23-10121
Petitioner / Appellant:
David Ray Baker
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Baker v. Lumpkin
as 5:2022cv01285
Petitioner:
Stanley Foster Baker
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
