Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Davis v. McCarthy et al
as 3:2022cv00523
Plaintiff:
Eddie James Davis, Jr.
Defendant:
Major Unknown McCarthy and Keith Reed
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
James Morrison v. Lorie Davis, Director
as 18-50563
Petitioner - Appellant:
JAMES DAVIS MORRISON
Respondent - Appellee:
LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Morrison v. Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
as 5:2017cv01290
Respondent:
Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Petitioner:
James Davis Morrison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Morrison v. Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
as 2:2017cv00246
Petitioner:
James Davis Morrison
Respondent:
Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Rhondy Davis, Sr. v. Lorie Davis, Director
as 16-51327
Petitioner - Appellant:
RHONDY JAMES DAVIS, SR.
Respondent - Appellee:
LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Davis v. Werner
as 6:2015cv00212
Petitioner:
Rhondy James Davis, Sr.
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Respondent:
William Stephens and John P. Werner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Davis v. Lauderdale County
as 3:2015cv00387
Plaintiff:
Eddie James Davis, Jr.
Defendant:
Lauderdale County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Rhondy Davis, Sr. v. E. Laberneuer, et al
as 15-50136
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RHONDY JAMES DAVIS, SR.
Defendant - Appellee:
E. LABERNEUER, CAPTAIN L. BROWN, L. GLATT and others
Davis v. M. Travis Bragg, Warden
as 3:2008cv00291
Petitioner:
James Davis
Respondent:
M. Travis Bragg, Warden
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Davis v. Berkebile et al
as 3:2007cv00714
Petitioner:
James Davis
Respondent:
David Berkebile and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
