Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Powell v. Banks et al
as 3:2017cv00866
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Powell
Defendant:
Jacqueline Banks , United States Bureau of Prison(s) and Jim Hood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hocker v. Chapa et al
as 1:2017cv00347
Petitioner:
Roshay L Hocker
Respondent:
Rachel Chapa, United States Bureau of Prisons and Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Caudill v. United States Bureau of Prisons
as 7:2015cv00140
Petitioner:
Terry Wayne Caudill
Respondent:
United States Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Campbell v. United States Bureau of Prisons
as 7:2015cv00080
Petitioner:
Wesley Bryan Campbell
Respondent:
United States Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
James Baker v. Rachel Chapa, et al
as 14-50243
Petitioner - Appellant:
JAMES E. BAKER
Respondent - Appellee:
RACHEL CHAPA, Warden, Federal Correctional Institution La Tuna and UNITED STATES BUREAU OF PRISONS
Baker v. Chapa
as 3:2014cv00006
Petitioner:
James E. Baker
Respondent:
Rachel Chapa and United States Bureau of Prisons
Notice Only Party:
Magdalena Jara
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
J. Baugus v. USA, et al
as 12-41399
Petitioner - Appellant:
J. B. BAUGUS
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and UNITED STATES BUREAU OF PRISONS
Javier Renteria v. USA, et al
as 12-50935
Petitioner - Appellant:
JAVIER RENTERIA
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL, WARDEN, RCDC III and others
Paul Driggers v. Maureen Cruz, et al
as 12-10775
Petitioner - Appellant:
PAUL WILLIAM DRIGGERS
Respondent - Appellee:
MAUREEN CRUZ, Warden and UNITED STATES BUREAU OF PRISONS
McKnight v. United States Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2011cv00051
Petitioner:
Deametrius McKnight
Respondent:
United States Bureau of Prisons, Eric Holder and Karen Edenfield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
