Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Minix v. United States Parole Commission
as 4:2021cv00842
Petitioner:
Charlie Minix
Respondent:
The United States Parole Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Mitchell v. Bergami et al
as 3:2019cv00255
Respondent:
United States Parole Commission and Thomas E. Bergami
Petitioner:
Ambrose Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Hines v. Johnson et al
as 1:2019cv00284
Defendant:
Calvin Johnson, United States Parole Commission, Patricia K. Cushwa and others
Plaintiff:
Herbert Hines
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Williamson v. United States of America et al
as 1:2016cv00002
Petitioner:
Terry Dewayne Williamson
Respondent:
United States of America and United States Parole Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Roy Roybal v. U.S. Parole Commission, et al
as 13-40858
Petitioner - Appellant:
ROY ROYBAL
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION and C. V. RIVERA, Warden
Terry Williamson v. USA, et al
as 13-40853
Petitioner - Appellant:
TERRY DEWAYNE WILLIAMSON
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
Smith v. Vasquez et al
as 1:2013cv00330
Petitioner:
Charles Kelvin Smith
Respondent:
N Vasquez and United States Parole Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Smith v. Vasquez et al
as 1:2013cv00134
Petitioner:
Charles Kelvin Smith
Respondent:
C Vasquez and United States Parole Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Allah Burman v. M. Martin, et al
as 13-40224
Petitioner - Appellant:
ALLAH BURMAN
Respondent - Appellee:
M MARTIN, Warden, UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION and REGIONAL DIRECTOR, TEXAS BUREAU OF PRISONS
Gerald Rogers v. U.S. Parole Commissiom
as 12-50992
Petitioner - Appellant:
GERALD LEO ROGERS
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
