Cases 1 - 10 of 6,586
Williams v. Louisiana et al
as 2:2024cv01306
Defendant:
Unknown Calcasieu Parish Sheriff Officers and State of Louisiana
Plaintiff:
Ira Lee Williams, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Williams
as 1:2024cv00153
Respondent:
B Williams
Petitioner:
Roger Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Cooke County Detention Center
as 4:2024cv00871
Respondent:
Cooke County Detention Center
Petitioner:
Lorenzo Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
McRand v. Wingfield
as 3:2024cv00533
Defendant:
Warden Wingfield
Plaintiff:
William McRand
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Smith v. Williams
as 1:2024cv00144
Petitioner:
Roger Smith
Respondent:
B Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Rutherford
as 3:2024cv02277
Petitioner:
Jay Williams
Respondent:
Rebecca Rutherford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2024cv00806
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Petitioner:
Garrison Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sorrells v. Wheat
as 1:2024cv00938
Respondent:
William Wheat
Petitioner:
Scott Eugene Sorrells
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McCarley v. Director, TDCJ
as 4:2024cv00703
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ
Petitioner:
William Harold McCarley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Warden, FCI Beaumont Medium
as 1:2024cv00303
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Beaumont Medium
Petitioner:
Gerald Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
