Cases 131 - 140 of 1,017
Willie Washington v. Lorie Davis, Director
as 17-70009
Petitioner - Appellant:
WILLIE TERION WASHINGTON
Respondent - Appellee:
LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Reinaldo Dennes v. Lorie Davis, Director
as 17-70010
Petitioner - Appellant:
REINALDO DENNES
Respondent - Appellee:
LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Charles Thompson v. Lorie Davis, Director
as 17-70008
Petitioner - Appellant:
CHARLES VICTOR THOMPSON
Respondent - Appellee:
LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Cole v. Davis
as 4:2017cv00940
Petitioner:
Jaime Piero Cole
Defendant:
Lorie Davis
Respondent:
LORIE DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Medrano v. Davis
as 7:2017cv00069
Petitioner:
Rodolfo Medrano
Respondent:
Lorie Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jedidiah Murphy v. Lorie Davis, Director
as 17-70007
Petitioner - Appellant:
JEDIDIAH ISAAC MURPHY
Respondent - Appellee:
LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Rolando Ruiz v. Lorie Davis, Director
as 17-70006
Petitioner - Appellant:
ROLANDO RUIZ
Respondent - Appellee:
LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Leza v. Davis
as 5:2017cv00101
Respondent:
Lorie Davis
Notice Only Party:
Death Penalty Noticing
Petitioner:
Armando Leza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ruiz v. Davis
as 5:2017cv00100
Respondent:
Lorie Davis
Notice Only Party:
Death Penalty Noticing
Petitioner:
Rolando Ruiz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hummel v. Stephens
as 4:2016cv00133
Petitioner:
John Hummel
Defendant:
Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.