Cases 101 - 110 of 1,096
Peters v. Rosenthal
as 3:2022cv00102
Plaintiff:
Michael G. Peters
Defendant:
Lee H. Rosenthal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clay v. Hanson
as 22-40180
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Thomas H. Clay
Defendant / Appellee:
Janis Hanson, NP, Dr. Georgia Nehotebah, FNP/CMC, Dr. Rivers and others
Casby v. McConnell et al
as 1:2022cv00837
Plaintiff:
Cyrus Casby and Original Juice Mann
Defendant:
Warden McConnell, Dr King, Dr Humi and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Peters v. Rosenthal
as 22-20152
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Michael G. Peters
Defendant / Appellee:
Lee H. Rosenthal, U.S. District Judge
Patrick v. Herbst
as 22-40150
Plaintiff / Appellant:
John T. Patrick
Defendant / Appellee:
Jennifer Hirbst, Ray A. Guevara, Francisco Olvera, Jr. and others
Lindsey v. Caddo Parish Correctional Center
as 5:2022cv00819
Plaintiff:
Jamie H Lindsey
Defendant:
Caddo Parish Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hyde v. Tom S. Whitehead Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00252
Plaintiff:
Tristan Michael Hyde
Defendant:
Tom S. Whitehead Inc., Washington County, TX, Washington County Sheriff's Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Herron v. Thomas
as 22-20120
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DeMarkes Herron
Defendant / Appellee:
Officer Thomas, Lieutenant Zuniga, Warden W. H. Jones and others
Ford v. Doe et al
as 9:2022cv00030
Plaintiff:
David Wayne Ford
Respondent:
Jane Doe, John Doe, Bobby D Lumpkins and others
Defendant:
E. Sells, B. Polk, B. Marshall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Yoo v. The Federal Bureau of Prison Director et al
as 4:2022cv00133
Plaintiff:
Heon Jong Yoo
Defendant:
The Federal Bureau of Prison Director, South Central Regional Director, FCI Fort Worth Warden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
