Cases 101 - 110 of 58,660
Mozingo v. Sullivan et al
as 4:2024cv01949
Plaintiff:
Johnny Mozingo
Defendant:
Dana Sullivan, Brian Sullivan, Laundry Capitan Jesus Trevino and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boykin v. Liddell El Bey
as 4:2024cv00462
Plaintiff:
Torey Boykin
Defendant:
Tony Liddell El Bey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ezenwa v. Harris County of Texas
as 4:2024cv01927
Plaintiff:
Maxwell C. Ezenwa
Defendant:
Harris County of Texas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Doe
as 5:2024cv00709
Plaintiff:
Jay Williams
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mozee v. Chandler et al
as 5:2024cv00121
Plaintiff:
Patrick O Mozee
Defendant:
Nathan Chandler and Jennifer Hamilton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McGaughey v. Unit et al
as 2:2024cv00117
Plaintiff:
Ronald McGaughey
Defendant:
McConnell Unit, Wardon Amanet, Ass. Wardon Samiago and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hughes v. Captain Gipson et al
as 9:2024cv00094
Plaintiff:
Charles Harold Hughes
Defendant:
Captain Gibson, Sgt Sykes and Office of the Attorney General - Amicus Curiae
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Deases v. Mr. B. Cain et al Case transferred to the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division.
as 6:2024cv00180
Plaintiff:
Estevan Deases
Respondent:
Mr. B. Cain and M.T.C.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James v. E Baton Rouge City Prsh
as 24-30318
Plaintiff:
Michael A. James, real party in interest Conner A. James
Defendant:
East Baton Rouge City Parish, Sid J. Gautreaux, III, Joshua Clark and others
Williams v. Junes et al
as 4:2024cv00463
Plaintiff:
Travis Williams
Defendant:
Judge Steven Junes, District Attorney Phil Sorrells, Bill Waybourn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
