Cases 31 - 40 of 100
Heath v. Germbino et al
as 4:2023cv00163
Plaintiff:
Secial Heath
Defendant:
Jason Germbino, Mike Germbino, James Young and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cook v. Dobbs et al
as 1:2023cv00094
Plaintiff:
Armando Cook
Defendant:
Bryan Dobbs, J Bartlett, FNU Parks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Heath v. French Robertson Unit
as 4:2023cv01159
Plaintiff:
Secial Heath
Defendant:
French Robertson Unit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Heath v. Davenport
as 4:2023cv00681
Plaintiff:
Seciol Heath and Secial Heath
Defendant:
Stacy Davenport
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Heath v. Thrasher et al
as 4:2023cv00761
Plaintiff:
Secial Heath
Defendant:
Bob Thrasher, James Young, Brad Shepard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Heath v. Anderson et al
as 4:2023cv00753
Plaintiff:
Secial LaRoyce Heath
Defendant:
Tamekia Anderson and Daisy Davenport
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Heath v. Germbino et al
as 2:2023cv00043
Plaintiff:
Secial Heath
Defendant:
Jason Germbino, David Davidison, Mike Davidson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reid v. Dobbs
as 1:2023cv00032
Plaintiff:
Lesford Mark Reid
Defendant:
Bryan K Dobbs, Unknown Bartlett, Unknown Rhodes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rodriguez, Jr. v. Texas Department of Correctional Justice
as 9:2018cv00176
Defendant:
Steven Edwards, Michael Davis, Donald Patrick and others
Plaintiff:
Frank W Rodriguez, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rivers v. Zwolle Police Department et al
as 5:2023cv00134
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Shane Rivers
Defendant:
Zwolle Police Dept, Daniel Thomas, Stephon Colliens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
