Cases 31 - 40 of 836
Cortez, Jr. v. Skyview Unit et al
as 9:2023cv00066
Plaintiff:
Stephen Cortez, Jr.
Defendant:
Skyview Unit and Gib Lewis Unit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lewis v. N P D C et al
as 1:2023cv00347
Plaintiff:
Burchie Lewis, III
Defendant:
Natchitoches Parish Detention Center, Sheriffs Office Natchitoches Parish, Ms Clark-McOneal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garrett v. Smith Unit
as 5:2023cv00032
Plaintiff:
Michael Lewis Garrett
Defendant:
Smith Unit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martinez v. Perez et al
as 9:2023cv00027
Plaintiff:
Juan Antonio Martinez
Defendant:
Martin Perez, Texas Department of Criminal Justice and Gib Lewis Unit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McGaughey v. Gib Lewis Unit
as 9:2023cv00016
Plaintiff:
Ronald McGaughey
Respondent:
Gib Lewis Unit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McGaughey v. Gib Lewis Unit
as 6:2023cv00024
Plaintiff:
Ronald McGaughey
Respondent:
Gib Lewis Unit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lumsden et al v. Collier et al
as 6:2023cv00011
Plaintiff:
Raymond E. Lumsden, Norman Horton, Benjamin Benson and others
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Bobby Lumpkin, C.F. Hazelwood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baston v. State of Texas et al
as 4:2022cv01144
Plaintiff:
John Lewis Baston
Defendant:
State of Texas, 297th District Court and 396th District Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lewis v. MDOC et al
as 4:2022cv00189
Plaintiff:
Willie Lewis
Defendant:
MDOC, MDOC Medical Contractor, Dwight Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Garrett v. Smith Unit
as 4:2022cv04371
Plaintiff:
Michael Lewis Garrett
Defendant:
Smith Unit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
