Cases 41 - 50 of 117
Johnson v. TDCJ-CID's Safe Prisons Mandate et al
as 2:2012cv00243
Plaintiff:
Richard James Johnson
Defendant:
TDCJ-CID's Safe Prisons Mandate, PLRA's 3 Strike Provisons, Estate of John Ross Kay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. TDCJ-CID's Safe Prisons Mandate et al
as 9:2012cv00187
Plaintiff:
Richard James Johnson
Defendant:
TDCJ-CID's Safe Prisons Mandate, PLRA's 3 Strike Provisons, Estate of John Ross Kay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clyde Miles v. Steven Rich, et al
as 12-40830
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CLYDE DENE MILES
Defendant - Appellee:
STEVEN RICH, also known as Stevin Rich, GIDEON DANIEL, also known as Gideon A. Daniels, GENE A KROLL, Assistant Warden and others
Ronnie Davis v. James LeBlanc, et al
as 12-30756
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONNIE KEITH DAVIS
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES LEBLANC, LYNN COOPER, BLANE LACHNEY and others
Richard Johnson v. Gerald Goodwin, et al
as 12-40643
Petitioner - Appellant:
RICHARD J JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
GERALD GOODWIN, PAUL WHITE and CLYDE HERRINGTON
Richard Johnson v. Paul White, et al
as 12-40641
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD J JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
PAUL E WHITE, ESTATE OF JOHN ROSS KAY, STATE BAR OF TEXAS and others
Johnson v. Goodwin et al
as 9:2012cv00059
Petitioner:
Richard James Johnson
Defendant:
Gerald Goodwin, Paul White and Clyde Herrington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. White et al
as 9:2012cv00057
Plaintiff:
Richard James Johnson
Defendant:
Paul E White, Estate of John Ross Kay, State Bar Of Texas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Gaskill et al
as 1:2012cv00868
Plaintiff:
Clyde Williams
Defendant:
Gaskill, Tim Keith, Pat Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dean v. LeBlanc et al
as 3:2011cv00826
Defendant:
Neil Campbell, Eugene Ferguson, James LeBlanc and others
Plaintiff:
Noel Dean
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
