Cases 41 - 50 of 96
Banks v. Roe et al
as 3:2017cv00451
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Central Intelligence Agency, Robert Cessar, Federal Bureau of Investigation and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Banks v. Roe et al
as 3:2017cv01988
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Adrian Roe, Mark R. Hornak, Robert Cesare and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Roe et al
as 6:2017cv00192
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Central Intelligence Agency, AUSA Robert Cessar, Federal Bureau of Investigation and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Banks v. Roe et al
as 4:2017cv00579
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Adrian Roe, Mark R. Hornak, Robert Cessar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Roe et al
as 1:2017cv00304
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Adrian Roe, Mark R Hornak, Robert Cessar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Roe et al
as 5:2017cv00153
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Adrian Roe, Mark R. Hornak, Robert Cessar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Roe et al
as 2:2017cv06054
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Adrian Roe, Mark R. Hornak, Robert Cessar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Roe et al
as 6:2017cv00371
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Adrian Roe, Mark R Hornak, Robert Cessar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodney Palmer v. Loretta Lynch, et al
as 16-50102
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RODNEY JAMES PALMER
Defendant - Appellee:
LORETTA LYNCH, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY'S OFFICE and others
Joseph Blimline v. Thirty Unknown Employees, et al
as 16-10067
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH S. BLIMLINE
Defendant - Appellee:
THIRTY UNKNOWN EMPLOYEES OF THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION and FIFTEEN UNKNOWN EMPLOYEES OF THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
