Cases 41 - 50 of 149
Lloyd London v. Green, et al
as 17-51020
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LLOYD LONDON
Defendant - Appellee:
SHERIFF GREEN, Custodian and any Successor Prosecutor of Milam County or any successor State of Texas, PROSECUTOR OF MILAM COUNTY OR ANY SUCCESSOR, STATE OF TEXAS and others
London v. Green
as 6:2017cv00247
Defendant:
Juanita Champion, Sgt. FNU Goodrich, Sheriff Green and others
Plaintiff:
Lloyd London
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
London v. GreenDO NOT DOCKET. CASE ELECTRONICALLY TRANSFERRED TO THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS - WACO DIVISION.
as 1:2017cv00185
Plaintiff:
Lloyd London
Defendant:
Sheriff Green
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marcos Ortiz v. Juaquine Pope, et al
as 17-20188
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARCOS ORTIZ
Defendant - Appellee:
JUAQUINE POPE, in their official capacity, MICHAEL LEWIS, in their official capacity, DIVEONLEA LOTT, in their official capacity and others
Pratt v. Lasalle Corrections Corp et al
as 1:2017cv00159
Defendant:
Lasalle Corrections Corp, Winn Correctional Center, Keith Deville and others
Plaintiff:
Lloyd Pratt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hill v. Fagan, et al
as 1:2016cv00185
Plaintiff:
O C Hill, Jr
Defendant:
Lloyd Fagan, Russell Thomason and Gary Don Peak
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Payne v. Phor et al
as 3:2016cv00165
Plaintiff:
Lloyd Payne
Defendant:
Phor, Da'Kenya McDavis and Mrs. Burks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Byron Lloyd v. Kevin Strickland, et al
as 16-30799
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BYRON S. LLOYD
Defendant - Appellee:
KEVIN S. STRICKLAND, J. R. CURTIS and B. W. STRANGE
Jason Hendrix v. Lloyd Aschberger, et al
as 16-20156
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JASON HENDRIX
Defendant - Appellee:
LLOYD ASCHBERGER, P.A., JACKIE ASHCRAFT, L.V.N., K. JOHNSON, L.V.N./C.I.D. and others
Lloyd v. Cain et al
as 3:2015cv01651
Plaintiff:
Michael Ray Lloyd
Defendant:
Joseph Cain, Jim Cerda, Tavarus Montgomery and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
