Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Jeffrey Mann v. Lorie Davis, Director, et al
as 18-40393
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEFFREY CHARLES MANN
Defendant - Appellee:
LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION, JOHN DOE, Director, TDCJ Health Care System, UTMB DIRECTOR, Medical Branch, Field Services Division and others
Walker v. Cazes et al
as 3:2016cv00146
Defendant:
Joe Arabie and Michael B Cazes
Plaintiff:
Michael Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker v. Bell et al
as 4:2016cv00031
Plaintiff:
Michael Walker
Defendant:
Oliver Bell, Gregory Nussel, John Minor Wisdom and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker v. Cazes et al
as 2:2015cv00763
Plaintiff:
Michael Walker
Defendant:
Michael B Cazes and Joe Arabie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker v. LaSalle Management Co. et al
as 5:2014cv00107
Plaintiff:
Michael Walker
Defendant:
LaSalle Management Co. and FNU Bowens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Walker v. Malise Prieto, et al
as 11-30942
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL WALKER
Defendant - Appellee:
MALISE PRIETO, Clerk of Court, BETTY VENTURELLA, C.S.R., Certified Reporter, 22nd Judicial District Court and SCOTT GARDNER, Assistant District Attorney, Parish of St. Tammany, State of Louisiana
Dawes v. Dupuy et al
as 3:2011cv00142
Defendant:
Ulyses Addison, Jr., Kyle Alford, All Current City Council Members and others
Plaintiff:
Alan Dawes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker v. Anderson et al
as 4:2010cv00839
Plaintiff:
Michael Walker
Defendant:
Dee Anderson and NFN Dixon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker v. Anderson et al
as 4:2010cv00771
Plaintiff:
Michael Walker, Jr
Defendant:
Dee Anderson, P Williams and Martinez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker v. Prieto et al
as 2:2010cv02541
Plaintiff:
Michael Walker
Defendant:
Malise Prieto, Betty Venturella and Scott Gardner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
